Numerical Investigations of Body Tail Projectile

Wessam Mahfouz Elnaggar This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.¹, Zhi-Hua Chen¹ and Zhen-Gui Huang¹

¹Key Laboratory of Transient Physics, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, P.R. China

REFERENCES

1. [1] Sahu, J., Transonic Navier-Stokes Computations for a Spinning Body of Revolution. Tech. Rep. ARL-TR3265, U.S. Army Research Laboratory (1991).
2. [2] Weinacht, P., Prediction of Projectile Performance, Stability and Free-flight Motion Using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Tech. Rep. ARL-TR-3015, Army Research Laboratory (2003).
3. [3] Townsend, A. A., The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, 2 ed. Cambridge Univ. Press, March (1980).
4. [4] Rodi, W., “DNS and LES for Some Engineering Flows,” Fluid Dynamics Research, Vol. 38, pp. 145 173 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.fluiddyn.2004.11.003
5. [5] Sagaut, P., “Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows,” An Introduction, Springer, Berlín (2001). doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/12/10/707
6. [6] Calo, V., “Residual-based Multiscale Turbulence Modeling: Finite Volume Simulations of Bypass Transition,” PhD thesis, Stanford University (2005).
7. [7] Massey, K. C., McMichael, J., Warnock, T. and Hay, F., “Mechanical Actuators for Guidance of a Supersonic Projectile,” 23rd Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA 2005-4970 (2005). doi: 10.2514/6.2005- 4970
8. [8] Chapman, D. R., “Computational Aerodynamics Development and Outlook,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 12931313 (1979). doi: 10.2514/3.61311
9. [9] Smagorinsky, J., “General Circulation Experiments with the Primitive Equations: I. the Basic Equations,” Mon. Weather Rev., 91, pp. 99–164 (1963). doi: 10. 1175/1520-0493(1963)0912.3.CO;2
10. [10] Sidra I. Silton, “Comparison of Predicted Actuator Performance for Guidance of Supersonic Projectiles to Measured Range Data,” 22nd Applied Aerodynamics Conference and Exhibit, AIAA 2004-5195 (2004). doi: 10.2514/6.2004-5195