Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

2.10

CiteScore

Taweechai Ouypornkochagorn This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1

1Faculty of Engineering, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand


 

Received: March 26, 2019
Accepted: May 14, 2019
Publication Date: September 1, 2019

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.201909_22(3).0011  

ABSTRACT


Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is an imaging technique used for localizing impedance change by using boundary voltage information. In the application to the head, instead of using a reconstruction image for localization,scalp voltage response was used to roughly localize the response sources. In this study, the applicability of this approach to use scalp voltage for localizing neuronal sources was investigated. An inclusion was used to mimic the neuronal response. Two conventional EIT current-injection patterns, i.e. adjacent and opposite current injection were simulated. The results show that, in many cases, the location where the significant voltage response occurred was not the nearby location of the source of response. Almost all responses obtained from the adjacent injection pattern were misinterpreted. In the case of using the opposite injection pattern, the voltage response can be roughly used to localize the source of response, but not straightforwardly. The response obtained from the low-sensitivity regions and that obtained from the regions where a current injection electrode was situated and the source was not nearby were misinterpreted. However, the misinterpreted response of the latter region can be identified by determining the amplitude. Therefore, using the opposite pattern can roughly localize the source of response. This can be used for interpreting the scalp voltage response without the need for exhaustive work of image reconstruction. This also can be used as a guideline to interpret responses reported by previous studies and to design current and measurement configuration of EIT applications.


Keywords: Neuronal Response Misinterpretation, Scalp Voltage Response, Current Patterns


REFERENCES


  1. [1] Tang, C., F. You, G. Cheng, D. Gao, and F. Fu (2008) Correlation between structure and resistivity variations of the live human skull, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 55(9), 22862292. doi: 10. 1109/TBME.2008.923919
  2. [2] Hoekema,R., G. H. Wieneke, F. S. S. Leijten, C. W. M. v. Veelen,P. C.v. Rijen, G. J. M.Huiskamp,J. Ansems, and A. C. v. Huffelen (2003) Measurement of the conductivity of skull, temporarily removed during epilepsy surgery, Brain Topography 16(1), 2938.
  3. [3] Holder, D. S., A. Rao, and Y. Hanquan (1996) Imaging of physiologically evoked responses by electrical impedance tomography with cortical electrodes in the anaesthetized rabbit, Physiol. Meas. 17, A179–A186. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/17/4A/022
  4. [4] Holder, D. (2005) Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications, Bristol, Institute of Physics. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/26/4/B01
  5. [5] Klivington, K. A., and R. Galambos (1968) Rapid resistance shifts in cat cortex during click-evoked responses, J Neurophysiol 31(4), 565573. doi: 10. 1152/jn.1968.31.4.565
  6. [6] Dowrick, T., G. S. D. Santos, A. Vongerichten, and D. Holder (2015) Parallel, multi frequency EIT measurement, suitable for recording impedance changes during epilepsy, Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance 6, 3743. doi: 10.5617/jeb.2573
  7. [7] Gilad, O., A. Ghosh, D. Oh, and D. S. Holder (2009) A method for recording resistance changes non-invasively during neuronal depolarization with a view to imagingbrain activitywithelectricalimpedancetomography, Journal of Neuroscience Methods 180, 8796. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.03.012
  8. [8] Murrieta-Lee, J. C., C. J. D. Pomfrett, P. C. W. Beatty, C. B. Mussel, R. C. Waterfall, N. Polydorides, and H. McCann (2005) EIT voltage changes on the human scalp due to brain stimulus, 15th International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers, 2005. doi: 10.1109/CONIEL.2005.38
  9. [9] McCann, H., N. Polydorides, J. C. Murrieta-Lee, K. Ge, P. Beatty, and C. J. D. Pomfrett (2006) Sub-second functional imaging by electrical impedance tomography, Proceedings of the 28th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference, New York City, USA. doi: 10. 1109/IEMBS.2006.259504
  10. [10] McCann, H., S. T. Ahsan, J. L. Davidson, R. L. Robinson, P. Wright, A. Bryan, B.J. Pollard, T. Quraishi, and C. J. D. Pomfrett(2011) Preliminaryobservations with fEITER data under auditory stimulation, Proc. XIIth International Conference on Electrical Impedance Tomography, Univ. of Bath.
  11. [11] Bayford, R. H., K. G. Boone, Y. Hanquan, and D. S. Holder (1996) Improvementof the positional accuracy of EIT images of the head using a Lagrange multiplier reconstruction algorithm with diametric excitation, Physiol. Meas. 17, A49–A57. doi: 10.1088/09673334/17/4A/008
  12. [12] Abascal, J.-F. P. J., S. R. Arridge, D. Atkinson, R. Horesh, L. Fabrizi, M. D. Lucia, L. Horesh, R. H. Bayford, and D. S. Holder (2008) Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography; description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head, NeuroImage 43(2), 258268. doi: 10.1016/j. neuroimage.2008.07.023
  13. [13] Tidswell, T., A. Gibson, R. H. Bayford, and D. S. Holder (2001) Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography of human brain activity, NeuroImage 13, 283294. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0698
  14. [14] Gilad, O., and D. S. Holder (2009) Impedance changes recorded with scalp electrodes during visual evoked responses: implicationsfor electricalimpedancetomography of fast neural activity, NeuroImage 47, 514 522. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.085
  15. [15] Tidswell, A. T., A. Gibson, R. H. Bayford, and D. S. Holder (2001) Electrical impedance tomography of human brain activity with a two-dimensional ring of scalp electrodes, Physiol. Meas. 22, 167175.
  16. [16] Gilad, O., L. Horesh, and D. S. Holder (2005) Non-invasive imaging of synchronized neuronal activity us
    ing low frequency electrical impedance tomography, The 3rd European Medical & Biological Engineering Conference (EMBEC 05), IFMBE, Prague.
  17. [17] Murrieta-Lee, J. C., C. J. D. Pomfrett, P. C. W. Beatty, N. Polydorides, C. B. Mussel, R. C. Waterfall, and H. McCann (2004) Sub-second observations of EIT voltage changes on the human scalp due to brain stimulus, 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEMBS ‘04). doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2004.1403414
  18. [18] Anas, M. N., A. N. Norali, and M. Rehman (2012) Development of a low cost precision blood resistivity measurement device based on Thompson Lampard Theorem, 2012 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICoBE), Penang. doi: 10.1109/ ICoBE.2012.6178986