Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

2.10

CiteScore

Fan Chen1 and Yajing Liu This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.1

1School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, 411201, P.R. China


 

Received: April 13, 2015
Accepted: August 16, 2015
Publication Date: September 1, 2015

Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2015.18.3.03  


ABSTRACT


A model based on Bayesian belief network is put forward to solve the innovation performance problems of the urban subway construction safety in China. After a systematic analyzing of the influence factors on the technological innovation performance, 13 variables were chosen in the light of implementation factors, interference factors, mediation factors and control factors, by taking the application of building information model as a case study. The causal relationship between these variables was constructed by the cause and effect diagram of experts’prior knowledge, combined with the correlation analysis method to determine the Bayesian belief network system structure. Sample data was got through a structural questionnaire survey. It was fit by NETICA software to get the probability density of each node. The application results show that this method can achieve a certain quantitative analysis of the innovation performance of the subway construction safety technology, and has better compliance compared with actual engineering situation.


Keywords: Safety Control, Subway Construction, Technical Innovation Performance, Bayesian Network, Building Information Model


REFERENCES


  1. [1] Deng, X. P., Li, Q. M. and Zhou, Z. P., “Statistical Analysis of Subway Construction Safety Accident Regularity,” Statistics & Decision, Vol. 26, No. 9, pp. 8789(2010).
  2. [2] Azhar, S., “Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry,” Leadership and Management in Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 241252 (2011). doi: 10.1061/ (ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127
  3. [3] Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R. and Liston ,K., BIM Handbook -A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors, 2nd ed, Wiley (2011). doi: 10.5130/ ajceb.v12i3.2749
  4. [4] Linderoth, C., “Understanding Adoption and Use of BIM as the Creation of Actor Networks,” Automation in Construction, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 6672 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.09.003
  5. [5] Risto, T., “Challenges of Implementing New Technologies in the World of BIM: Case Study from Construction Engineering Industry in Finland,” Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 21, pp. 469477 (2015). doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00201-4
  6. [6] Hannes, L. and Susanna, V., “BIM Implementation and Organisational Change: A Case Study of a Large Swedish Public Client,” Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 21, pp. 178184 (2015). doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671 (15)00165-3
  7. [7] Man, Q. P. and Li, X. D. “Collaborative Construction Based on Ubiquitous Computing and BIM,” China Civil Engineering Journal, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 311 315 (2012).
  8. [8] Liu, R. R. and Li, Z. M., “Modelling Study of P-xylene Oxidative Side-reaction Based on Bayesian Filtering,” Computer Modelling & New Technologies, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 9598 (2014).
  9. [9] Tu, J. X., “Retrieving Product Information of Collaborative Enterprises Based on Bayesian Network,” Computer Modelling & New Technologies, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 263266 (2014).
  10. [10] McCabe, B., AbouRizk, S. and Goebel, R., “Belief networks for Construction Performance Diagnostics,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 93100 (1998) doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887- 3801(1998)12:2(93)
  11. [11] Adams, F., “Expert Elicitation and Bayesian Analysis of Construction Contract Risks: an Investigation,” Construct Manage Economy, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 8196 (2006). doi: 10.1080/01446190500310254
  12. [12] Majeed, A., Faisal, K., Nima, K. and Stephen, B., “Safety and Risk Analysis of Managed Pressure Drilling Operation Using Bayesian Network,” Safety Science, Vol. 76, pp. 133144 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.ssci. 2015.01.010
  13. [13] Van, T., Kim, S.-Y., Nguyen, V. T. and Ogunlana, S. O., “Quantifying Schedule Risk in Construction Projects Using Bayesian Belief Networks,” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 3950 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.03.003
  14. [14] Chen, T.-T. and Leu, S.-S., “Fall Risk Assessment of Cantilever Bridge Projects Using Bayesian Network,” Safety Science, Vol. 70, pp. 161171 (2014). doi: 10. 1016/j.ssci.2014.05.011
  15. [15] Martin, J. E., Rivas, T. and Matias, J. M. A., “Bayesian Network Analysis of Work Place Accidents Caused by Falls from a Height”. Safety Science, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 206214 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.03.004
  16. [16] Matias, J. M., Rivas, T. and Martin, J. E., “A Machine Learning Methodology for the Analysis of Workplace Accidents,” Int. J. Computer. Math, Vol. 85, No. 3/4, pp. 559578 (2008). doi: 10.1080/002071607012973 46
  17. [17] Lee, E. and Parky, Shin, J. G., “Large Engineering Project Risk Management Using a Bayesian Belief Network,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 58805887 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008. 07.057
  18. [18] Zhang, L. M., Wu, X. G., Miroslaw, J. S., Zhong, J. B. and Lu, Y. J., “Bayesian-network-based Safety Risk Analysis in Construction Projects,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 131, pp. 2939 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.06.006
  19. [19] Zhou, G. H. and Peng, B., “Analysis of Quality Management Risk in Large Construction Projects Based on Bayesian Network,” China Soft Science, Vol. 31, No. 9, pp. 99106 (2009).
  20. [20] Wang, T., Liao, B. C., Ma, X. and Fang, D. P., “Using Bayesian Network to Develop a Probability Assessment Approach for Construction Safety Risk,” China Civil Engineering Journal, Vol. 43, pp. 385391 (2010).
  21. [21] Yang, C. and Wang, S. C., “Identification of Technological Innovation Risk Based on Dynamic Naïve Bayes Network,” Journal of Intelligence, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 8385 (2011).
  22. [22] Chen, F. and Xie, H. T., “Risk Analysis of Construction Technology Innovation by Bayesian Networks Model A Case Study of Green Building Innovation Project,” Computer Engineering and Applications, Vol. 50, No. 18, pp. 3338 (2014).
  23. [23] Bayraktar, M. E. and Hastak, M., “Bayesian Belief Network Model for Decision Making in Highway Maintenance: Case Studies,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 135, No. 13, pp. 1357 1369 (2009). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.00 00111
  24. [24] Hu, X. X., Yang, S. L. and Ma, X. J., “Bayesian Network Modeling Method for Complex Problems,” Journal of System Simulation, Vol. 18, No. 11, pp. 3241 3246 (2006).
  25. [25] Chen, F. and Xie, H. T., “Metro Construction Safety Risk Assessment Based on Rough Set and RBF neural Network,” Journal of Safety and Environment, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 232235 (2013). doi: 10.1061/41177 (415)166
  26. [26] Mehmet, E. B. and Makarand, H., “Bayesian Belief Network Model for Decision Making in Highway Maintenance, Case Studies,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol .135, No. 12, pp. 13571369 (2009). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943- 7862.0000111
  27. [27] Nadkarni, S. and Shenoy, P. P., “A Bayesian Network Approach to Making Inferences in Causal Maps,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 128, No. 3, pp. 479498 (2001). doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217 (99)00368-9
  28. [28] Guan, J. C., Richard, C. M. Y., Chiu, K. M. and Ning, M., “A Study of the Relationship between Competitiveness and Technological Innovation Capability Based on DEA Models,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 170, No. 3, pp. 971986 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.054
  29. [29] Hannes, W. L. and Dennis, H., “Trajectories of Efficiency Measurement: A Bibliometric Analysis of DEA and SFA,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 240, No. 1, pp. 121 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.ejor. 2014.04.041