Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

2.10

CiteScore

Vu Dan ChinhThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Do Thanh Long, Hà Thi Thu Nguyên, and Dinh Quang Cuong

Faculty of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Hanoi University of Civil Engineering, 55 Giai phong str., Hai ba trung dist., Hanoi 100 000, Vietnam


 

 

Received: April 10, 2023
Accepted: October 12, 2023
Publication Date: December 7, 2023

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202409_27(9).0008  


After many years of operation, the corrosion phenomenon frequently appears on fixed steel offshore platforms. It changes the concentrated stress in joints, greatly increasing fatigue damage, and hastening structural collapse. This study examines the impact of corrosion at various regions along the chord of the compressive T-joint on the stress concentration factor (SCF) of the chord hotspots. Therefore, the region of influence is split into 15 shells. The impact ratio of the thickness in each shell on the SCF is estimated by using the numerical model in 54 scenarios of different corrosion. Also, a formula for calculating the equivalent thickness of a non-uniformly corroded chord is established using the regression approach. The condition that the SCF based on API employing equivalent thickness is comparable to the actual value of the hotspots on the corroded joint using gathered data is satisfied by this equation. Additionally, 4 scenarios for 2 numerical simulations of T-joints are used to validate the equation, together with surveying data from the White Tiger field. Additionally, using an experiment with compressive T-joints strengthened by doubler plates is used to compare the SCF. These outcomes all provide a good match for the new formula, which can reduce the SCF’s computational time in similar conditions.


Keywords: non-uniform corrosion; tubular T-joint; axial loading; stress concentration factor (SCF); numerical models; equivalent thickness


  1. [1] N. D. Barltrop and A. J. Adams. Dynamics of fixed marine structures. 91. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013.
  2. [2] V. D. Chinh et al., (2023) “Corrosion effect on stress concentration factor in tubular T-joints under axial loading" Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering (JSTCE)-HUCE 17(3): 154–165.
  3. [3] L. Register, (1997) “Stress concentration factors for simple tubular joints, Lloyds Register of Shipping—Offshore Division, Vols":
  4. [4] A. RP2A-WSD, (2000) “Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms– working stress design–" Twenty-2000:
  5. [5] D. N. Veritas. Fatigue design of offshore steel structures. Recommended Practice. Tech. rep. DNV-RP-C203, 2011.
  6. [6] L. R. Rules. Rules for the Classification of Offshore Units. Tech. rep. Lloyd’s Register Group Limited, 2022.
  7. [7] H. Ahmadi and A. Kouhi, (2020) “Stress concentration factors of multi-planar tubular XT-joints subjected to outof-plane bending moments" Applied Ocean Research 96: 102058. DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2020.102058.
  8. [8] E. Zavvar, K. Hectors, and W. De Waele, (2021) “Stress concentration factors of multi-planar tubular KT-joints subjected to in-plane bending moments" Marine Structures 78: 103000. DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.103000.
  9. [9] F. Gao, Y. Shao, and W. Gho, (2007) “Stress and strain concentration factors of completely overlapped tubular joints under lap brace IPB load" Journal of Constructional Steel Research 63(3): 305–316. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.05.007.
  10. [10] D. S. Saini, D. Karmakar, and S. Ray-Chaudhuri, (2016) “A review of stress concentration factors in tubular and non-tubular joints for design of offshore installations" Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 1(3): 186–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.joes.2016.06.006.
  11. [11] H. Nassiraei and P. Rezadoost, (2022) “Stress concentration factors in tubular T-joints reinforced with external ring under in-plane bending moment" Ocean Engineering 266: 112551. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112551.
  12. [12] A. Sadat Hosseini, M. R. Bahaari, and M. Lesani, (2020) “SCF distribution in FRP-strengthened tubular Tjoints under brace axial loading" Scientia Iranica 27(3): 1113–1129. DOI: 10.24200/sci.2018.5471.1293.
  13. [13] T. C. Fung, C. Soh, T. Chan, and Erni, (2002) “Stress concentration factors of doubler plate reinforced tubular T joints" Journal of Structural Engineering 128(11): 1399–1412. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:11(1399).
  14. [14] H. S. Mohamed, Y. Shao, C. Chen, and M. Shi, (2021) “Static strength of CFRP-strengthened tubular TT-joints containing initial local corrosion defect" Ocean Engineering 236: 109484. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109484.
  15. [15] S. Shojai, P. Schaumann, M. Braun, and S. Ehlers, (2022) “Influence of pitting corrosion on the fatigue strength of offshore steel structures based on 3D surface scans" International Journal of Fatigue 164: 107128. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107128.
  16. [16] A. Yosri, A. Zayed, S. Saad-Eldeen, and H. Leheta, (2021) “Influence of stress concentration on fatigue life of corroded specimens under uniaxial cyclic loading" Alexandria Engineering Journal 60(6): 5205–5216. DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.004.
  17. [17] M. Jakubowski, (2015) “Influence of pitting corrosion on fatigue and corrosion fatigue of ship and offshore structures, part II: load-PIT-crack interaction" Polish Maritime Research 22(3): 57–66. DOI: 10.1515/pomr2015-0057.
  18. [18] VSP. White tiger field BK-1 in-air 2nd annual structural inspection report. 2018.
  19. [19] VSP. White tiger field MSP-6 in-air 3rd annual structural inspection report. 2019.
  20. [20] A. Aidibi, S. Babamohammadi, N. Fatnuzzi, J. A. Correia, and L. Manuel, (2021) “Stress concentration factor evaluation of offshore tubular KT joints based on analytical and numerical solutions: Comparative study" Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction 26(4): 04021047. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.000062.
  21. [21] M. Atteya, O. Mikkelsen, J. Wintle, and G. Ersdal, (2021) “Experimental and numerical study of the elastic SCF of tubular joints" Materials 14(15): 4220. DOI: 10.3390/ma14154220.
  22. [22] M. Lesani, A. S. Hosseini, and M. R. Bahaari. “Load bearing capacity of GFRP-strengthened tubular Tjoints: Experimental and numerical study”. In: Structures. 38. Elsevier. 2022, 1151–1164. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.092.
  23. [23] V. D. Chinh and H. T. T. Nguyên, (2022) “Numerical models for stress analysis of non-uniform corroded tubular members under compression" Structural Engineering and Mechanics 84(4): 517. DOI: 10.12989/sem.2022.84.4.517.
  24. [24] H. S. Mohamed, Y. Shao, C. Chen, and M. Shi, (2021) “Static strength of CFRP-strengthened tubular TT-joints containing initial local corrosion defect" Ocean Engineering 236: 109484. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109484.
  25. [25] M. A. Sambo, G. R. Kol, and G. Betchewe, (2022) “Analysis of Stress Concentration Factors due to in-Plane Bending and out-of-Plane Bending Loads on Tubular TYJoints of Offshore Structures" Journal of Marine Science and Application 21(4): 78–94. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-022-00303-9.
  26. [26] ABS. Guide for the fatigue assessment of offshore structures. 2003.


    



 

2.1
2023CiteScore
 
 
69th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Enter your name and email below to receive latest published articles in Journal of Applied Science and Engineering.