Journal of Applied Science and Engineering

Published by Tamkang University Press

1.30

Impact Factor

2.10

CiteScore

Yijia Yuan, Kailun Chen, Yujie Wu, Jian Wang, Yue Sheng, Jiahui Li, and Baohua ShenThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Information Engineering College, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 311305, Zhejiang, China


 

Received: February 13, 2024
Accepted: May 26, 2024
Publication Date: July 9, 2024

 Copyright The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are cited.


Download Citation: ||https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202505_28(5).0001  


Energy conservation and emissions reduction are pivotal goals that hinge on precise energy consumption estimating and the assessment of retrofit options. Prioritizing energy-efficient practices in building management has gained significance in both theoretical research and practical applications. This ongoing research seeks to deliver a comprehensive solution by amalgamating advanced optimization algorithms with meticulous prediction of heating load (HL), addressing the pressing need for accuracy in this domain. The investigation delves into the intricate realm of HL systems, where the intricacies of energy optimization present diverse challenges necessitating thorough exploration and innovative problem-solving approaches. Two meta-heuristic techniques, the Adaptive Opposition Slime Mould Algorithm (AOSMA) and the Snake Optimizer (SO), have been combined to improve the accuracy of the K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN) model. These algorithms scrutinize HL data collected from various soil types via prior stability tests to validate the models. Three unique models are presented in the study: KNSO, KNAO, and an independent KNN model. All three models provide insightful information for accurate HL prediction. Notably, the KNAO model is a standout performance with an RMSE value of 0.8003 and an R2 value of 0.993 which is remarkably low. These results underscore the effectiveness of the KNAO model in predicting HL outcomes with remarkable accuracy.

 


Keywords: Heating Load; K-Nearest Neighbor; Snake Optimizer; Adaptive Opposition Slime Mould Algorithm


  1. [1] M. R. Biswas, M. D. Robinson, and N. Fumo, (2016) “Prediction of residential building energy consumption: A neural network approach" Energy 117: 84–92.
  2. [2] B. Sadaghat, A. Javadzade Khiavi, B. Naeim, E. Khajavi, H. Sadaghat, and A. R. Taghavi Khanghah, (2023) “The utilization of a naıve bayes model for predicting the energy consumption of buildings" Journal of Artificial Intelligence and System Modelling 1(01): 73–91.
  3. [3] M. Proti´c, S. Shamshirband, M. H. Anisi, D. Petkovi´c, D. Miti´c, M. Raos, M. Arif, and K. A. Alam, (2015) “Appraisal of soft computing methods for short term consumers’ heat load prediction in district heating systems" Energy 82: 697–704.
  4. [4] Y. Ding, Q. Zhang, T. Yuan, and F. Yang, (2018) “Effect of input variables on cooling load prediction accuracy of an office building" Applied Thermal Engineering 128: 225–234.
  5. [5] Q. Zhang, Z. Tian, Z. Ma, G. Li, Y. Lu, and J. Niu, (2020) “Development of the heating load prediction model for the residential building of district heating based on model calibration" Energy 205: 117949.
  6. [6] G. Xue, C. Qi, H. Li, X. Kong, and J. Song, (2020) “Heating load prediction based on attention long short term memory: A case study of Xingtai" Energy 203: 117846.
  7. [7] A. T. C. on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology, (2000) “Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: Hydrologic applications" Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 5: 124–137.
  8. [8] Z.-H. Zhou. Machine learning. Springer nature, 2021.
  9. [9] S. Afzal, B. M. Ziapour, A. Shokri, H. Shakibi, and B. Sobhani, (2023) “Building energy consumption prediction using multilayer perceptron neural network-assisted models; comparison of different optimization algorithms" Energy 282: 128446.
  10. [10] H. Wang, Z. Lei, X. Zhang, B. Zhou, and J. Peng, (2016) “Machine learning basics" Deep learning: 98–164.
  11. [11] S. M. Weiss and C. A. Kulikowski. Computer systems that learn: classification and prediction methods from statistics, neural nets, machine learning, and expert systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1991.
  12. [12] Q. Zhang, Z. Tian, Z. Ma, G. Li, Y. Lu, and J. Niu, (2020) “Development of the heating load prediction model for the residential building of district heating based on model calibration" Energy 205: 117949.
  13. [13] E. Guelpa, L. Marincioni, M. Capone, S. Deputato, and V. Verda, (2019) “Thermal load prediction in district heating systems" Energy 176: 693–703.
  14. [14] S. Shamshirband, D. Petkovi´c, R. Enayatifar, A. H. Abdullah, D. Markovi´c, M. Lee, and R. Ahmad, (2015) “Heat load prediction in district heating systems with adaptive neuro-fuzzy method" Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 48: 760–767.
  15. [15] A. N. Sharif, S. K. Saleh, S. Afzal, N. S. Razavi, M. F. Nasab, and S. Kadaei, (2022) “Evaluating and Identifying Climatic Design Features in Traditional Iranian Architecture for Energy Saving":
  16. [16] B. Sadaghat, S. Afzal, and A. J. Khiavi, (2024) “Residential building energy consumption estimation: A novel ensemble and hybrid machine learning approach" Expert Systems with Applications 251: 123934.
  17. [17] I. Jaffal, C. Inard, and C. Ghiaus, (2009) “Fast method to predict building heating demand based on the design of experiments" Energy and Buildings 41: 669–677.
  18. [18] P. J. G. Nieto, E. García–Gonzalo, F. S. Lasheras, J. P. Paredes–Sánchez, and P. R. Fernández, (2019) “Forecast of the higher heating value in biomass torrefaction by means of machine learning techniques" Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 357: 284–301.
  19. [19] G. Xue, C. Qi, H. Li, X. Kong, and J. Song, (2020) “Heating load prediction based on attention long short term memory: A case study of Xingtai" Energy 203: 117846.
  20. [20] Y. Ding, Q. Zhang, T. Yuan, and K. Yang, (2018) “Model input selection for building heating load prediction: A case study for an office building in Tianjin" Energy and Buildings 159: 254–270.
  21. [21] T.-Y. Kim and S.-B. Cho, (2019) “Predicting residential energy consumption using CNN-LSTM neural networks" Energy 182: 72–81.
  22. [22] A. Moradzadeh, A. Mansour-Saatloo, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, and A. Anvari-Moghaddam, (2020) “Performance evaluation of two machine learning techniques in heating and cooling loads forecasting of residential buildings" Applied Sciences 10: 3829.
  23. [23] S. S. Roy, P. Samui, I. Nagtode, H. Jain, V. Shivaramakrishnan, and B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, (2020) “Forecasting heating and cooling loads of buildings: A comparative performance analysis" Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 11: 1253–1264.
  24. [24] S. Afzal, B. M. Ziapour, A. Shokri, H. Shakibi, and B. Sobhani, (2023) “Building energy consumption prediction using multilayer perceptron neural network-assisted models; comparison of different optimization algorithms" Energy 282: 128446.
  25. [25] L. Xiong and Y. Yao, (2021) “Study on an adaptive thermal comfort model with K-nearest-neighbors (KNN) algorithm" Building and Environment 202: 108026.
  26. [26] H. A. A. Alfeilat, A. B. A. Hassanat, O. Lasassmeh, A. S. Tarawneh, M. B. Alhasanat, H. S. E. Salman, and V. B. S. Prasath, (2019) “Effects of distance measure choice on k-nearest neighbor classifier performance: a review" Big data 7: 221–248.
  27. [27] S. Uddin, I. Haque, H. Lu, M. A. Moni, and E. Gide, (2022) “Comparative performance analysis of K-nearest neighbour (KNN) algorithm and its different variants for disease prediction" Scientific Reports 12: 6256.
  28. [28] F. A. Hashim and A. G. Hussien, (2022) “Snake Optimizer: A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm" Knowledge-Based Systems 242: 108320.
  29. [29] O. Altay, (2022) “Chaotic slime mould optimization algorithm for global optimization" Artificial Intelligence Review 55: 3979–4040.


    



 

2.1
2023CiteScore
 
 
69th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Enter your name and email below to receive latest published articles in Journal of Applied Science and Engineering.